1- Department of Exercise Physiology, Ker.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah,Iran
2- Department of Exercise Physiology, Ker.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah,Iran ,mehran.physiology@gmail.com
3- Department of Physical Education, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Exercise Physiology, Ker.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah,Iran ,
3- Department of Physical Education, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (2477 Views)
Background: Concurrent training, defined as the combination of endurance and resistance exercises within a short time frame, has recently gained significant attention in women due to its relevance for performance, health, and body composition. However, the unique hormonal characteristics of women may influence physiological adaptive responses and potentially modulate the degree of interference between strength and endurance adaptations.
Methods: This paper presents a narrative review with a systematic approach, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed from each database’s inception until January 2025. English-language studies were included if they investigated concurrent resistance and endurance training in women, including randomized controlled trials, interventional studies, and observational studies reporting outcomes related to strength, endurance, hormonal responses, or interference effects. Studies focusing exclusively on hydration, nutrient timing, or unrelated performance modifiers were excluded. A total of 55 studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to methodological heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not feasible; therefore, findings were synthesized narratively across three predefined domains. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework.
Results: Across the included studies (n = 55), evidence of moderate certainty suggests that estrogen may attenuate muscle damage and modulate interference effects on strength adaptations, particularly in the follicular phase. However, evidence regarding luteal-phase recovery and progesterone-mediated effects remains limited and of low certainty. Endurance-dominant sequencing appears to increase AMPK activation, potentially inhibiting mTOR signaling, although findings are inconsistent. Overall, hormonal fluctuations may partially explain sex-specific responses to concurrent training.
Conclusion: Due to sex-specific physiological and hormonal characteristics, women exhibit distinct responses to concurrent training. Targeted manipulation of training variables according to menstrual cycle phase and the reduction of conflicting molecular signaling can mitigate interference effects and enhance performance.
Methods: This paper presents a narrative review with a systematic approach, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed from each database’s inception until January 2025. English-language studies were included if they investigated concurrent resistance and endurance training in women, including randomized controlled trials, interventional studies, and observational studies reporting outcomes related to strength, endurance, hormonal responses, or interference effects. Studies focusing exclusively on hydration, nutrient timing, or unrelated performance modifiers were excluded. A total of 55 studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to methodological heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not feasible; therefore, findings were synthesized narratively across three predefined domains. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework.
Results: Across the included studies (n = 55), evidence of moderate certainty suggests that estrogen may attenuate muscle damage and modulate interference effects on strength adaptations, particularly in the follicular phase. However, evidence regarding luteal-phase recovery and progesterone-mediated effects remains limited and of low certainty. Endurance-dominant sequencing appears to increase AMPK activation, potentially inhibiting mTOR signaling, although findings are inconsistent. Overall, hormonal fluctuations may partially explain sex-specific responses to concurrent training.
Conclusion: Due to sex-specific physiological and hormonal characteristics, women exhibit distinct responses to concurrent training. Targeted manipulation of training variables according to menstrual cycle phase and the reduction of conflicting molecular signaling can mitigate interference effects and enhance performance.
Keywords: Concurrent Training, Interference Effect, Female Athletes, Hormonal Responses, Training Optimization
References
1. Mikkonen RS, Ihalainen JK, Hackney AC, Häkkinen K. Perspectives on Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training in Healthy Adult Females: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2024;54(3):673-96. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Huiberts RO, Wüst RCI, van der Zwaard S. Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Sex and Training Status. Sports Med. 2024;54(2):485-503. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Wang T, Bo S. Optimizing concurrent training programs: A review on factors that enhance muscle strength. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(52):e41055. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Delgado-Floody P, Chirosa-Ríos L, Caamaño-Navarrete F, Valdés-Badilla P, Herrera-Valenzuela T, Monsalves-Álvarez M, et al. Concurrent training and interindividual response in women with a high number of metabolic syndrome risk factors. Front Physiol. 2022;13:934038. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Taipale RS, Forssell J, Ihalainen JK, Kyröläinen H, Häkkinen K. A 10-Week Block of Combined High-Intensity Endurance and Strength Training Produced Similar Changes in Dynamic Strength, Body Composition, and Serum Hormones in Women and Men. Front Sports Act Living.
2020;2:581305. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Ekenros L, von Rosen P, Solli GS, Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC, Hirschberg AL, et al. Perceived impact of the menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptives on physical exercise and performance in 1,086 athletes from 57 sports. Front Physiol. 2022;13:954760. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Taipale-Mikkonen RS, Raitanen A, Hackney AC, Solli GS, Valtonen M, Peltonen H, et al. Influence of Menstrual Cycle or Hormonal Contraceptive Phase on Physiological Variables Monitored During Treadmill Testing. Front Physiol. 2021;12:761760. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Bouamra M, Zouhal H, Ratel S, Makhlouf I, Bezrati I, Chtara M, et al. Concurrent Training Promotes Greater Gains on Body Composition and Components of Physical Fitness Than Single-Mode Training (Endurance or Resistance) in Youth With Obesity. Front Physiol. 2022;13:869063. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Osmani F, Terán-Fernández D, Alonso-Pérez S, Ruiz-Alias SA, García-Pinillos F, Lago-Fuentes C. Can women maintain their strength performance along the menstrual cycle? Appl Sci. 2024;14(21):9818. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. Trowell D, Fox A, Saunders N, Vicenzino B, Bonacci J. Effect of concurrent strength and endurance training on run performance and biomechanics: A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022;32(3):543-58. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Prieto-González P, Sedlacek J. Effects of Running-Specific Strength Training, Endurance Training, and Concurrent Training on Recreational Endurance Athletes' Performance and Selected Anthropometric Parameters. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10773. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Gao J, Yu L. Effects of concurrent training sequence on VO₂max and lower limb strength performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1072679. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Kissow J, Jacobsen KJ, Jessen S, Thomsen LB, Quesada JP, Bangsbo J, et al. Menstrual cycle phase-based interval training yields distinct muscle changes in female athletes. medRxiv . 2024. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Kissow J, Jacobsen KJ, Jessen S, Thomsen LB, Quesada JP, Bangsbo J, et al. Global Proteomics Reveals Distinct Muscle Adaptations to Menstrual Cycle Phase-Based Sprint Interval Training in Endurance-Trained Females. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2025;24(10):101053. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Chen Y, Feng X, Huang L, Wang K, Mi J. Comparative efficacy of concurrent training types on lower limb strength and muscular hypertrophy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J ExercSci Fit. 2024;22(1):86-96. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Hawley JA. Molecular responses to strength and endurance training: are they incompatible? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34(3):355-61. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Nelson WB, Pfeifer BS, Lovell AR, Marchant ED, Mitchell BV, Atkinson EL,et al. Menstrual cycle influence on skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiration in humans. Physiol Rep. 2025;13(13):e70458. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
18. Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L, Sanchis-Moysi J, Dorado C, Mora-Custodio R, et al. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(7):724-35. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Markov A, Bussweiler J, Baumert P, Helm N, Rex M, Behm S, et al. The Order of Concurrent Training Affects Acute Immunological Stress Responses and Measures of Muscular Fitness in Female Youth Judo Athletes. Eur J Sport Sci. 2025;25(2):e12262. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Delgado-Floody P, Soriano-Maldonado A, Rodríguez-Pérez MA, Latorre-Román PÁ, Martínez-Salazar C, Vargas CA, et al. The Effects of Two Different Concurrent Training Configurations on Markers of Metabolic Syndrome and Fitness in Women with Severe/Morbid Obesity: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Front Physiol. 2021;12:694798. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Seipp D, Quittmann OJ, Fasold F, Klatt S. Concurrent training in team sports: A systematic review. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2023;18(4):1342-64. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. Vikestad V, Dalen T. Effect of Strength and Endurance Training Sequence on Endurance Performance. Sports (Basel). 2024;12(8):226. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
23. Monteiro PA, Chen KY, Lira FS, Saraiva BT, Antunes BM, Campos EZ, et al. Concurrent and aerobic exercise training promote similar benefits in body composition and metabolic profiles in obese adolescents. Lipids Health Dis. 2015;14:153. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Liu C, Zhang Z, Mao R, Xia L, Xie Y. Effects of concurrent training on the Chinese female elite triathletes. PLoS One. 2025;20(8):e0329588. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
25. Kubica C, Ketelhut S, Nigg CR. Polarized running training adapted to versus contrary to the menstrual cycle phases has similar effects on endurance performance and cardiovascular parameters. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024;124(11):3433-44. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
26. Liu C, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Kong H, Zhao E, Xie Y. Effects of concurrent training on body composition, metabolic, and inflammatory in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health. 2026;26(1):186. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
27. Álvarez C, Ramírez-Campillo R, Lucia A, Ramírez-Vélez R, Izquierdo M. Concurrent exercise training on hyperglycemia and comorbidities associated: Non-responders using clinical cutoff points. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29(7):952-67. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
28. Ho SS, Dhaliwal SS, Hills AP, Pal S. The effect of 12 weeks of aerobic, resistance or combination exercise training on cardiovascular risk factors in the overweight and obese in a randomized trial. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:704. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
29. Petersen AC, Fyfe JJ. Post-exercise Cold Water Immersion Effects on Physiological Adaptations to Resistance Training and the Underlying Mechanisms in Skeletal Muscle: A Narrative Review. Front Sports Act Living. 2021;3:660291. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
30. Taylor MY, Hrozanova M, Nordengen L, Sandbakk Ø, Osborne JO, Noordhof DA. Influence of Menstrual-Cycle Phase on Sleep and Recovery Following High- and Low-Intensity Training in Eumenorrheic Endurance-Trained Women: The Female Endurance Athlete Project. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024;19(12):1491-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
31. Heileson JL, McGowen JM, Moris JM, Tomas J. Chapman-Lopez TJ, Torres R, Funderburk LK, et al. Body Composition, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, and Vitamin D Are Associated with Army Combat Fitness Test Performance. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 19 (1): 349–65. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
32. Marquet LA, Brisswalter J, Louis J, Tiollier E, Burke LM, Hawley JA, et al. Enhanced Endurance Performance by Periodization of Carbohydrate Intake: "Sleep Low" Strategy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(4):663-72. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
33. Madeira R, Esteves D, Maia A, Alves AR, Marques DL, Neiva HP. Efficacy of Concurrent Training in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Physical, Psychological, and Biomarker Variables. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;13(1):33. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
34. Gerland L, Baumann FT, Niels T. Resistance Exercise for Breast Cancer Patients? Evidence from the Last Decade. Breast Care (Basel). 2021;16(6):657-63. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
35. Jones TW, Howatson G, Russell M, French DN. Performance and neuromuscular adaptations following differing ratios of concurrent strength and endurance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(12):3342-51. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
36. Denadai BS, Greco CC. Muscle fatigue and interference phenomenon during concurrent aerobic and strength training: An alternative hypothetical model. Med Hypotheses. 2025;198:111614. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
37. Bernedo GO, Haseler LJ, Netto KJ, Chapman DW. An exploratory study on whether the interference effect occurs when high-intensity strength training is performed prior to high-intensity interval aerobic training. Appl Sci. 2024;14(18):8447. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
38. Wadsworth DD, Rodriguez-Hernandez M, Huffman LS, McDonald JR, Spring KE, Pascoe DD. Adaptations to a Concurrent Exercise Training Program in Inactive Aging Women. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(11):3217-23. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
39. Wen D, Utesch T, Wu J, Robertson S, Liu J, Hu G, Chen H. Effects of different protocols of high intensity interval training for VO2max improvements in adults: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(8):941-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
40. Atakan MM, Li Y, Koşar SN, Turnagöl HH, Yan X . Evidence-based effects of high-intensity interval training on exercise capacity and health: A review with historical perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(13):7201. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
41. Ekenros L, von Rosen P, Solli GS, et al. The perceived influence of menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptives on training and performance: comparison between football, handball, and orienteering. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2024;19(4):1560–9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
42. Sims ST, Heather AK. Myths and methodologies: Reducing scientific design ambiguity in studies comparing sexes using the menstrual cycle phases . Exp Physiol. 2018;103(10):1309-17. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
43. von Rosen P, Ekenros L, Solli GS, Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC, Hirschberg AL,et al. Offered Support and Knowledge about the Menstrual Cycle in the Athletic Community: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1086 Female Athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):11932. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
44. Petré H, Hemmingsson E, Rosdahl H, Psilander N. Development of Maximal Dynamic Strength During Concurrent Resistance and Endurance Training in Untrained, Moderately Trained, and Trained Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2021 May;51(5):991-1010. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
45. Yu J, Lee E, Choi J-H, Sun Y, Woo S, Cho S.Combining Resistance and Various Modalities of Aerobic Exercise in Obese Women with Prehypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Metabolites. 2025;15(4):278. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
46. O'Bryan SM, Connor KR, Drummer DJ, Lavin KM, Bamman MM. Considerations for Sex-Cognizant Research in Exercise Biology and Medicine. Front Sports Act Living. 2022;4:903992. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
47. Schumann M, Feuerbacher JF, Sünkeler M, Freitag N, Rønnestad BR, Doma K, et al. Compatibility of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training for Skeletal Muscle Size and Function: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2022;52(3):601-12. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
48. Vikmoen O. Sex differences in concurrent aerobic and strength training. In: Concurrent aerobic and strength training: scientific basics and practical applications. Springer; 2019:309-21. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
49. Hagstrom AD, Marshall PW, Halaki M, Hackett DA. The Effect of Resistance Training in Women on Dynamic Strength and Muscular Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50(6):1075-93. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
50. Lesinski M, Prieske O, Granacher U. Effects and dose-response relationships of resistance training on physical performance in youth athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):781-95. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
51. Lloyd RS, Read P, Oliver JL, Meyers RW, Nimphius S, Jeffreys I. Considerations for the development of agility during childhood and adolescence. Strength Cond J. 2013;35(3):2-11. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
52. McMahon GE, Morse CI, Burden A, Winwoodet K, Onambéléal GL. Impact of range of motion during ecologically valid explosive resistance training on power development in women. J Strength Cond Res. 2022; 36(11):3012-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
53. Belamjahad A, Tourny C, Jebabli N, Clark CCT, Laher I, Hackney AC, et al. Effects of a Preseason Neuromuscular Training Program vs. an Endurance-Dominated Program on Physical Fitness and Injury Prevention in Female Soccer Players. Sports Med Open. 2024;10(1):76. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
54. Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Orazem J, Sabol F. Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci. 2022;11(2):202-11. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
55. Lopez P, Radaelli R, Taaffe DR, Newton RU, Galvão DA, Trajano GS, et al. Resistance training load effects on muscle hypertrophy and strength gain: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53(6):1203-16. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
