1- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran; Counseling and Reproductive Health Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran
3- Ischemic Disorders Research Center, Jorjani Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
4- Counseling and Reproductive Health Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran ,adibme921@gmail.com
2- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran
3- Ischemic Disorders Research Center, Jorjani Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
4- Counseling and Reproductive Health Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran ,
Abstract: (189 Views)
Background: Fertility is an important determinant of population dynamics and a key topic in demographic and public health research. This study aimed to assess attitudes toward fertility and childbearing among childless female teachers working in the education system of Gorgan, Iran, in 2023.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 465 eligible female teachers were recruited using systematic sampling. Data were collected using a demographic information form and the validated Persian version of Söderberg et al.'s Attitudes to Fertility and Childbearing Scale (AFCS). The data were analyzed in SPSS software version 19, using analysis of variance, independent t-tests, and Pearson’s correlation. The significance level was set at α = 0.05.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 36.42 ± 6.95 years, and the mean fertility attitude score was 55.65 ± 11.01. No significant association was found between the fertility attitude score and teachers’ education level, spouse’s occupation, employment status, homeownership status, or type of contraceptive method with all P > 0.05. However, Pearson’s correlation analysis showed positive correlations between the fertility attitude score and both age (r = 0.10, P = 0.03) and their work experience (r = 0.11, P = 0.02). Additionally, the relationship between the fertility attitude score and both household income level and spouse’s education level was borderline significant (P = 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest a significant relationship between age and work experience and attitudes towards fertility among female teachers in Gorgan. A positive correlation between older age/more work experience and a more favorable attitude toward fertility may be attributed to factors such as personal maturity, job stability, and psychological economic security. Therefore, cultural policies and programs related to fertility for this group could focus on creating supportive conditions for job stabilization and reducing stressors during the early years of service, aiming to foster a more positive experience of combining employment and childbearing.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 465 eligible female teachers were recruited using systematic sampling. Data were collected using a demographic information form and the validated Persian version of Söderberg et al.'s Attitudes to Fertility and Childbearing Scale (AFCS). The data were analyzed in SPSS software version 19, using analysis of variance, independent t-tests, and Pearson’s correlation. The significance level was set at α = 0.05.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 36.42 ± 6.95 years, and the mean fertility attitude score was 55.65 ± 11.01. No significant association was found between the fertility attitude score and teachers’ education level, spouse’s occupation, employment status, homeownership status, or type of contraceptive method with all P > 0.05. However, Pearson’s correlation analysis showed positive correlations between the fertility attitude score and both age (r = 0.10, P = 0.03) and their work experience (r = 0.11, P = 0.02). Additionally, the relationship between the fertility attitude score and both household income level and spouse’s education level was borderline significant (P = 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest a significant relationship between age and work experience and attitudes towards fertility among female teachers in Gorgan. A positive correlation between older age/more work experience and a more favorable attitude toward fertility may be attributed to factors such as personal maturity, job stability, and psychological economic security. Therefore, cultural policies and programs related to fertility for this group could focus on creating supportive conditions for job stabilization and reducing stressors during the early years of service, aiming to foster a more positive experience of combining employment and childbearing.
References
1. Nitsche N, Wilde J. Fertility and Family Dynamics in the Aftermath of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Population and Development Review. 2024;50(S1):9-22. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2. Azizmohamadi S, Hamidi Durbash Z. Economic Aspects of Changing Fertility Rates. Iranian Economic Development Analyses. 2022;8(2):133-52. [Google Scholar]
3. Erfani A. Policy Implications of Cultural Shifts and Enduring Low Fertility in Iran. Salamat Ijtimai (Community Health). 2019;6(2):112-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI]
4. Burfoot A, Güngör D. Women and reproductive technologies: The socio-economic development of technologies changing the world: Taylor & Francis; 2022. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Spolaore E, Wacziarg R. Fertility and Modernity. The Economic Journal. 2021;132(642):796-833. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Rangaswamaiah A. From Domestic Roles to Economic Independence: Analysing Women's Evolving Participation in the Labour Force. SIJSS. 2024;22(3):11-21. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Offer S, Kaplan D. The "New Father" Between Ideals and Practices: New Masculinity Ideology, Gender Role Attitudes, and Fathers' Involvement in Childcare. Social Problems. 2021;68(4):986-1009. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Afra H, Ayar A, Eliasi M, Danesh Y. The importance of childbearing in an individualistic society. Quarterly Journal. 2022;13(2):21-43.
9. Iida A. How Do Traditional Gender Roles Influence Women's Lives in Taiwan? An Investigation of Highly Educated Women's Willingness to Create Families. East Asia. 2023;40(1):81-100. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. van Bijleveld GG, Dedding CWM, Bunders-Aelen JFG. Children's and young people's participation within child welfare and child protection services: a state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work. 2015;20(2):129-38. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Mehta CM, Davis GE, Smith K. "Shouldn't I Know If I Want to Have Kids or Not?": Established Adult Women's Reproductive Decision Making. Journal of Adult Development. 2025. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Szcześniak M, Timoszyk-Tomczak C, Łoś J, Grzeczka M. Future anxiety and the motives for postponing parenthood: generational time perspective and life satisfaction as mediators. Front Psychol. 2025:15:1441927. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Piotrowski K. How many parents regret having children and how it is linked to their personality and health: Two studies with national samples in Poland. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0254163. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Ranjbar M, Rahimi MK, Heidari E, Bahariniya S, Alimondegari M, Lotfi MH, et al. What factors influence couples' decisions to have children? Evidence from a systematic scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24(1):223. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Omid M, Shahhosseini Z, Hosseinnataj A, Zamaniyan M, Ganji J. Investigating the Factors Related to Desire to Have Children: A Systematic Review. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci . 2024;34(232):246-59. [View at Publisher]
16. Safdari-Dehcheshmeh F, Noroozi M, Taleghani F, Memar S. Factors Influencing the Delay in Childbearing: A Narrative Review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2023;28(1):10-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Safdari-Dehcheshmeh F, Noroozi M, Taleghani F, Memar S. Explaining the pattern of childbearing behaviors in couples: Protocol for a focused ethnographic study. J Educ Health Promot. 2022;11(1):71. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
18. Alijanzadeh M, Bahrami N, Jafari E, Noori M, Miri F, Joftyar M, et al. Iranian women's attitude toward childbearing and its' association with generalized trust, social support, marital satisfaction and governmental childbearing incentives. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e16162. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Cegolon L, Hay SI. Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950-2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The lancet. 2024;403(10440):2057-99. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Kashani L, Akhondzadeh S. The Future of Iran's Population: Balancing Aging Trends and Fertility Rates. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2025;17(2):82. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Joulaei H, Morshed-Behbahani B, Ghadimi P, Nadimi Parashkouhi S, Mansoori Y. Contentious population policy-making and its consequences: a health policy analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2025;24(1):96. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Hashemzadeh M, Shariati M, Mohammad Nazari A, Keramat A. Childbearing intention and its associated factors: A systematic review. Nurs Open. 2021;8(5):2354-68. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
23. Meamar FZ, Farajkhoda T. Iranian Aging Tsunami from the Perspective of Sexual and Reproductive Health: Challenges and Strategies for Childbearing. JMRH. 2023;11(1):3540-54. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
24. Rasheed NM, Tashtoush MA. The fertility and its relation with some demographic, economic and social variables in Jordan. Turcomat. 2021;12(11):5088-95. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
25. Ghanbari Y, Hovasin NM, Jamini D, Mafakheri A, Gashtil K. Spatial Analysis and Classification of Women's Employment Indices in Rural Areas of Iran. Am J.Sci Res. 2012;71(30):74-83. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
26. De Backer J, Haugaa KH, Hasselberg NE, de Hosson M, Brida M, Castelletti S, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46(43):4462-568. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
27. Zarei Salehabadi M, Kheirkhah M, Esmaeili N, Haghani S. Effects of Empowerment on the Attitudes toward Fertility and Childbearing in Women with Failed Pregnancies: A Clinical Trial. IJN . 2020;33(125):55-69. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
28. Söderberg M, Christensson K, Lundgren I, Hildingsson I. Women's attitudes towards fertility and childbearing - A study based on a national sample of Swedish women validating the Attitudes to Fertility and Childbearing Scale (AFCS). Sex Reprod Healthc. 2015;6(2):54-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
29. Baezzat F, AHMADI GA, Marzbani Y, Karimi A, Azarnioshan B. A study of psychometric properties of Persian version of attitudes toward fertility and childbearing scale. 2017.
30. Nesfechi EF, Pouralizadeh M, Khalesi ZB. Relationship Between Spiritual Intelligence and Attitude Toward Fertility and Childbearing in Women. Arch Health Sci Res. 2024;11(3):196-202. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
31. Norozi L. Studying the impact of economic and social factors on female fertility rates in Iran. Economic and Planning Research. 1998;3(6):61-78.
32. Abdul Latiff M, Fang L, Goh DA, Tan LJ. A systematic review of factors associated with disclosure of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl.
2024;147:106564. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
33. Beaujouan É, Sobotka T. Is 40 the new 30? Increasing reproductive intentions and fertility rates beyond age 40. Optimizing the management of fertility in women over. 2022;40:3-18. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
34. Khadivzadeh T, Rahmanian SA, Esmaily H. Young Women and Men's Attitude towards Childbearing. Journal of Midwifery & Reproductive Health. 2018;6(3):1345-56. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
35. Arjmand Siahpoush E, Zeini Wendian M, Rezapour D. A Sociological Analysis for Factors Affecting the Attitude toward Childbearing (Case Study: Employees of Andimeshk Department of Education). Quarterly Journal of Social Development (Previously Human Development). 2021;16(1):59-78. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
36. Debnath A, Das S. Inter-relationship among female labour-force participation, fertility and economic development: Evidences from india. Economic Affairs. 2022;67(4):673-80. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
37. Lesthaeghe R. The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(51):18112-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
38. Owoo NS, Lambon-Quayefio MP. Does Job Security Affect Fertility and Fertility Intentions in Ghana? Examining the Evidence. J Fam Econ Issues. 2022;43(1):86-99. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
39. Gatta A, Mattioli F, Mencarini L, Vignoli D. Employment uncertainty and fertility intentions: Stability or resilience? Popul Stud (Camb). 2022;76(3):387-406. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
40. Davoudi F, Soleimanvandy Azar N, Ezoji H, Ezoji K. Determinants of Employed Women's Attitude towards Childbearing. JMRH. 2020;8(4):2472-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
41. AbbaiI SM, Sadeghi R. Ethnicity and fertility: an analysis of fertility behavior of ethnic groups in iran. Soc Sci Paper. 2006;29:29-58. [View at Publisher]
42. Ghahremani F, Ahmadi Doulabi M, Mahmoodi Z, Nasiri M. The structural factors of social determinants of health on Iranian women's childbearing: a systematic review study. IJOGI. 2023;26(2):99-118. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
43. Ghorbani Z, Aghasi M. Factors Affecting the Ideals of Childbearing among Young People within Iranian Ethnic Groups. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2025;36(2):133-48. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
44. Sadeghi R, Abedini Z, Malmir M, Ebrahimi M. Ethnic Differences in Childbearing Ideals and Behaviors in Iran. Journal of Population Association of Iran. 2025;19(38):57-95. [View at Publisher]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
